A campus or portfolio runs many buildings with one team — labs, classrooms, offices, plants, each with its own issues. Start with one building. As you add more, OnPoint ranks each building's issues by dollars, severity, and ease of repair, so limited staff and budget go where they return the most.
Compare buildings by open issues and their estimated dollar value. Start where the return is highest.
Example · buildings by estimated annual opportunity · illustrative figures
| Building | Size | Open issues | Est. annual opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Athletics Complex › start here | 380,000 sq ft | 14 | $88,000 |
| Research Labs | 620,000 sq ft | 11 | $64,000 |
| Main Library | 210,000 sq ft | 9 | $41,000 |
| Science Center | 540,000 sq ft | 4 | $22,000 |
| Admin Hall | 95,000 sq ft | 5 | $12,000 |
Put limited staff time where it returns the most. The ranking shows which building to start with.
Bring a building-by-building number tied to specific issues — evidence-backed estimates, validated when you share utility data.
Mark issues resolved in any building and OnPoint keeps watching for improvement.
Reviewing trend data across many buildings of mixed vintage and mixed vendors takes time most teams don't have. OnPoint reviews each building's data the same way, every analysis run.
The ranking and total identified opportunity — what you bring to budget and capital planning.
Open any building for its AIR score, ranked issues, evidence, root cause, and resolution guidance.
If the data reveals an issue, we'll show a representative finding and its potential savings.